• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact
Friday, May 30, 2025
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
NEWSLETTER
Federal Civil Discourse
  • Federal Evidence
    • All
    • Relevance
    • Hearsay
    • Authentication
    • Experts
    • Witnesses
    The Prongs of a Daubert Analysis - Eleventh Circuit Offers Guidance to Lower Courts (5-6-21)

    The Prongs of a Daubert Analysis: Eleventh Circuit Offers Guidance to Lower Courts

    Eleventh Circuit Reminds Lawyers About Low Bar to “Authenticating” Evidence (4-6-21)

    Eleventh Circuit Reminds Lawyers About Low Bar to “Authenticating” Evidence

    Eleventh Circuit Questions Trial Court's Admission of 404(b) Evidence (2-23-21)

    Eleventh Circuit Questions Trial Court’s Admission of 404(b) Evidence

    Trending Tags

    • Evidence
    • Exhibits
    • Expert Testimony
    • Civil Procedure
    • Criminal Procedure
    • Trial
  • District Courts
    • All
    • Southern District of Florida
    Court Discusses Rules Governing Demonstrative Exhibits (6-15-21)

    Court Discusses Rules Governing Demonstrative Exhibits

    Opinion From Federal Judge Underscores the Importance of the Federal Rules of Evidence at the Summary Judgment Stage (2-10-21)

    Opinion From Federal Judge Underscores the Importance of the Federal Rules of Evidence at the Summary Judgment Stage

    S.D. Fla. Federal District Judge Addresses Hearsay and Other Evidentiary Issues in Two Criminal Cases (12-1-20)

    S.D. Fla. Federal District Judge Addresses Hearsay and Other Evidentiary Issues in Two Criminal Cases

    Court Analyzes Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege (11-20-20)

    Court Analyzes Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege

  • Courts of Appeals
    • All
    • D.C. Circuit
    • First Circuit
    • Third Circuit
    • Fifth Circuit
    • Sixth Circuit
    • Seventh Circuit
    • Eighth Circuit
    • Ninth Circuit
    • Tenth Circuit
    • Eleventh Circuit
    The Prongs of a Daubert Analysis - Eleventh Circuit Offers Guidance to Lower Courts (5-6-21)

    The Prongs of a Daubert Analysis: Eleventh Circuit Offers Guidance to Lower Courts

    Eleventh Circuit Reminds Lawyers About Low Bar to “Authenticating” Evidence (4-6-21)

    Eleventh Circuit Reminds Lawyers About Low Bar to “Authenticating” Evidence

    Eleventh Circuit Questions Trial Court's Admission of 404(b) Evidence (2-23-21)

    Eleventh Circuit Questions Trial Court’s Admission of 404(b) Evidence

    Court Analyzes Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege (11-20-20)

    Court Analyzes Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege

    Eleventh Circuit Says District Judge Got 403 Analysis Right (11-18-20)

    Eleventh Circuit Says District Judge Got 403 Analysis Right

    Eleventh Circuit Allows Stolen Identity Evidence in Drug Case (10-28-20)

    Eleventh Circuit Allows Stolen Identity Evidence in Drug Case

    Eleventh Circuit Upholds Trial Court’s Admission of Both Expert Testimony About Alternative Saw Design and OSHA Reports (10-22-20)

    Eleventh Circuit Upholds Trial Court’s Admission of Both Expert Testimony About Alternative Saw Design and OSHA Reports

    Eleventh Circuit Allows Federal Agent to Offer Non-Expert Opinion on Handwriting

    Eleventh Circuit Re-affirms “Timing” Principle with Respect to Co-Conspirator Statements

  • Circuit Court Roundup
    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (6/6/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (6/14/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (6/6/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (6/6/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (6/6/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (6/5/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (6/6/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (5/24/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (6/6/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (5/18/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (6/6/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (5/16/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (6/6/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (5/10/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (6/6/19)

    Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (5/7/19)

  • Resources
    • Fed. Rules of Evidence
    • Fed. Rules of Civil Procedure
    • Fed. Rules of Criminal Procedure
    • Fed. Rules of Appellate Procedure
    • S.D. Fla. Local Rules
    • M.D. Fla. Local Rules
    • N.D. Fla. Local Rules
  • Judges
  • Links
    • ABA Journal
    • Bloomberg Law
    • Law360
    • Law.com
    • National Law Journal
    • POLITICO Law
    • The Wall Street Journal Law
    • Above the Law
    • Bench Memos
    • Dorf on Law
    • The Volokh Conspiracy
    • Trial Insider
    • Verdict
    • SCOTUS Blog
    • SDFLA Blog
    • Justice Building Blog
    • The Law Professor Blogs Network
Federal Civil Discourse
Home Federal Evidence Relevance

Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (5/10/19)

by PROPER
May 10, 2019
in Relevance, Federal Circuit Court Roundup, Federal Rules of Evidence, Eighth Circuit, Ninth Circuit
0 0
0
Federal Circuit Court Roundup: Published Evidence Cases (6/6/19)
0
SHARES
21
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Eighth Circuit

Case: United States v. Conner, No. 18-1032, 2019 WL 2039858, at *2 (8th Cir. May 9, 2019)

Type of Case: Criminal

Charges/Counts: 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act robbery); 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii) (brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence); and 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (unlawful possession of a firearm as a previously convicted felon).

Rule(s) of Evidence Cited: FRE 401; FRE 404(b)(2); FRE 403.

Brief Factual Summary: The government charged the Defendant with robbing a general store on December 7, 2016. The primary evidence of the robbery was the store’s surveillance video, which showed a masked person robbing the store. To help prove that the Defendant was the masked perpetrator, the government offered different surveillance videos from an earlier date. These surveillance videos, taken from a country jail on November 17, 2016, showed the Defendant “wearing a jacket and shoes that matched the jacket and shoes worn by the person that committed the robbery on December 7, 2016.”

The Defendant argued that the evidence should be excluded as improper character evidence under Rule 404(b) and as unfairly prejudicial under Rule 403. The district court admitted the videos under 404(b), explaining that they were “relevant on the issue of identity, and the clothing and apparel go directly to the issue of identity.”

Rulings

  • FRE 404(b)(2)

The Eighth Circuit upheld the admission of the evidence but, in so doing, ruled that Rule 404(b) did not apply. Rather, the Court held that the evidence was simply relevant under Rule 401. The Court reasoned:

“We agree that the evidence was relevant to whether Conner was the Casey’s robber. But while ‘identity’ is one of the permissible purposes for which evidence of prior bad acts may be admitted under Rule 404(b)(2), Conner’s attire is not the sort of ‘identity’ evidence contemplated by that rule. Rule 404(b) provides for the receipt of evidence of a defendant’s prior crimes to prove ‘identity’ in a situation ‘where the pattern and characteristics of the crimes are so unusual and distinctive as to be like a signature.’ United States v. Lewis, 483 F.3d 871, 875 (8th Cir. 2007) (internal quotation and brackets omitted). The evidence of Conner’s attire on November 17 was not evidence of a prior crime or wrong offered to show that he committed a ‘signature’ crime on December 7. It was simply relevant circumstantial evidence that he committed the robbery because he was known to wear clothing like that worn by the robber.”

  • FRE 403

The Court held that a limiting instruction regarding the county jail surveillance videos was sufficient to avoid any unfair prejudice.

CLICK HERE

Ninth Circuit

Case:  United States v. Carpenter, No. 17-10498, 2019 WL 2049818, at *5 (9th Cir. May 9, 2019)

Type of Case: Criminal

Charges/Counts: 18 U.S.C. § 1201(a)(1) (conspiracy to kidnap and kidnapping).

Rule(s) of Evidence Cited: FRE 404(b)(2); FRE 403.

Brief Factual Summary: Various defendants were charged with kidnapping a man who was suspected of stealing marijuana from a Mexican cartel. Their alleged plan was to trade the victim to a cartel for thirty pounds of marijuana.

At trial, the government sought to offer two pieces of evidence. First, evidence about the “missing marijuana” that allegedly motivated the kidnapping, which also served to implicate one of the defendants, Velazquez, in previous drug dealing. Second, evidence that Velazquez used methamphetamine during the kidnapping.

Rulings

  • FRE 404(b)(2)/403

With respect to the “missing marijuana,” the Ninth Circuit upheld the admission of the evidence. The Court wrote: “As Velazquez admits, the circumstances of the initial drug-trafficking incident and missing marijuana were necessary to provide a ‘coherent and comprehensible story’ regarding the background for the kidnapping of Gonzalez.”

With respect to Velazquez’s methamphetamine use during the kidnapping, the Ninth Circuit expressed serious “doubt” that the evidence was admissible under 404(b)(2). But even if it was, the Court reasoned, the district court should have excluded it under Rule 403. The Court wrote:

“We seriously doubt that Velazquez’s methamphetamine use speaks to his motive to commit kidnapping or conspiracy to kidnap, although we find that the evidence is probative of his state of mind and the absence of duress. Nonetheless, we conclude that the district court abused its discretion in admitting the evidence because it should have been excluded under Rule 403’s balancing. Drug use ‘is highly prejudicial,’ and the connection between the charged offenses and the methamphetamine use was evidently slight. Id. at 1017. The low probative value of the methamphetamine use—particularly in light of the other evidence that the government introduced to establish the absence of duress and the codefendants’ state of mind—is ‘substantially outweighed’ by its prejudice. Fed. R. Evid. 403.”

CLICK HERE

Tags: EvidenceCriminal Procedure
ShareTweetShare
PROPER

PROPER

Newsletter

THE MOST IMPORTANT LEGAL NEWS & EVENTS OF THE DAY

Subscribe to our mailing list to receive updates directly to your inbox.

THE MOST IMPORTANT WORLD NEWS AND EVENTS OF THE DAY

Subscribe to our mailing list to receive updates direct to your inbox!

Loading

Categories

Select Category

    Tags

    Appeal Civil Procedure Criminal Procedure Cross-Examination Daubert Standard Disqualifications Doctor-Patient Privilege DOJ Error Evidence Exhibits Expert Testimony Fairness Fifth Amendment Gatekeeper In Limine Intrinsic Evidence Doctrine Jury Instruction Litigation Medical Records Negligence Prima Facie Evidence Privileges Product Liability Reliability S.D. Fla. SEC Summary Judgment Testimony Trial Trial Preparation Unavailability Unfair Prejudice Unity of Adverse Party White Collar Crime Witness Wrongful Termination

    Newsletter

    THE MOST IMPORTANT WORLD NEWS AND EVENTS OF THE DAY

    Subscribe to our mailing list to receive updates direct to your inbox!

    Loading

    News Categories

    • Circuits At A Glance
    • Federal Circuit Court Roundup
    • Federal Rules of Evidence
    • Court Opinions
    • Marital Discord Evidence
    • Federal Evidence
      • Relevance
      • Hearsay
      • Authentication
      • Experts
      • Witnesses
    • U.S. District Courts
      • Southern District of Florida
    • U.S. Courts of Appeals
      • D.C. Circuit
      • First Circuit
      • Third Circuit
      • Fifth Circuit
      • Sixth Circuit
      • Seventh Circuit
      • Eighth Circuit
      • Ninth Circuit
      • Tenth Circuit
      • Eleventh Circuit

    Site Links

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    SITE BY PROPER

    • Home
    • About
    • Blog
    • Contact

    Copyright © 2024

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below

    Forgotten Password?

    Retrieve your password

    Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

    Log In

    Add New Playlist

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Federal Evidence
    • District Courts
    • Courts of Appeals
    • Circuit Court Roundup
    • Resources
      • Fed. Rules of Evidence
      • Fed. Rules of Civil Procedure
      • Fed. Rules of Criminal Procedure
      • Fed. Rules of Appellate Procedure
      • S.D. Fla. Local Rules
      • M.D. Fla. Local Rules
      • N.D. Fla. Local Rules
    • Judges
    • Links
      • ABA Journal
      • Bloomberg Law
      • Law360
      • Law.com
      • National Law Journal
      • POLITICO Law
      • The Wall Street Journal Law
      • Above the Law
      • Bench Memos
      • Dorf on Law
      • The Volokh Conspiracy
      • Trial Insider
      • Verdict
      • SCOTUS Blog
      • SDFLA Blog
      • Justice Building Blog
      • The Law Professor Blogs Network

    Copyright © 2024